0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£»çÀÇ °£È£¾÷¹« ¼öÇà¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÚ°¡Æò°¡¿Í »ó±ÞÀÚ Æò°¡ÀÇ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸ - ÀÏ°³ ´ëÇк´¿ø °£È£»ç¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î -

A Comparative Study Between Self Evaluation and Superior Evaluation in the Nursing Performance Appraisal

°£È£ÇÐ³í¹®Áý - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ 1996³â 10±Ç 1È£ p.71 ~ 86
KMID : 0350819960100010071
Á¶¹®¼ö (  ) - ¼Ò¼ÓÈ®ÀÎÁß

¹Ú¼º¾Ö (  ) - ¼Ò¼ÓÈ®ÀÎÁß

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to compare the scores between self evaluation and superior evaluation, and to comprehend the applicability of self evaluation in nursing performance appraisal.
During the period from Feb. 12th to Feb. 28th, 1994, 96 staff nurses were given self evaluation and 32 head nurses who are the superior of the staff nurses completed superior evaluation.
The nursing performance evaluation tool developed by Lee Beung Sook measured on 5 area of nursing activities was applied for data collection.
Data were analyzed by percentage distribution, paired t-test, scatter gram and persons correlation method.
The results are summarized as following.
1. The reliability of evaluation tool was relatively high both in self evaluation and superior evaluation(0.95).
2. In comparison of mean score was no significant difference between self evaluation and superior evaluation except the area of general nursing activities(p<0.05).
3. There was low correlation between self evaluation and superior evaluation except the are of Implementing nursing process.
From above findings this study suggests the following.
1. Comparison between this study findings and another evaluation tool in hospital are needed.
2. Further studies are needed to develop the self evaluation systematically.
KeyWords

pPrformance appraisal, self evaluation, superior evaluation, evaluation tool, nursing activity area
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸